4/17/2023 0 Comments Command and conquer 3 pc demo![]() SkyWalker 06:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC) Reply Yet noone interested having those sites added. I have already stated three old and active sites which many people go there. Those sites you mentioned are mostly spam and has no information. I also removed the link to from the media section as it seems redundant.įireryone 23:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC) Reply I noticed that someone added "fan sites" category again, adding and, I'll remove them for now unless the communities stance on fan links has changed, which I doubt. SkyWalker 18:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Reply Reason :- Very Old site has contributed a lot to C&C. Reason :- This site has also lot of information. Reason :- A very Popular and most contributed site. Unregistered users keeps on adding their own site. If you think a specific site should be listed, please explain why in detail here and it would be considered.- Localzuk (talk) 18:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Reply They was a fan sites link here before. ![]() If the open directory is bad, edit it - it is a collaborative project is it not? If it is blocked somewhere, that is not our issue. Yes the sites have info on them, but it is unreliable in 90% of cases. Remember, Wikipedia isn't a link farm - it is an encyclopedia. Jamhaw 18:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)jamhaw Reply You should take this up at the guideline. THe open directory idea doesn't work I find the open directory to be pretty much useless not to mention being blocked by netsentron. I dislike the no fan site rule first of all the fan sites are the best sources of inormation including info that doesn't find it's way into the official site.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |